Vess and Jan

My first job when I moved to Indy in 1998 was fixing up Vess Ruhtenberg's dad's house. Vess is a well known local musician, producer and overall aesthete with an obsession for architecture. His list of projects is too long to go into here. Google him. 

So how I talked Vess into paying me to do this I'm still not sure. I didn't know much about fixing up houses but I knew something about working on old cars. His father's 1960 MG A was sitting in the garage in a state of disrepair. One of my favorite memories is the eureka moment we had when we hand cranked the MG to life for the first time in decades after a lot of work. Yes, hand cranked.

While working on this project and hanging out with Vess I got to know more about his father and grandfather, Jan. Both were architects and from what Vess was uncovering it sounded like his grandfather might have been special. I hadn't yet begun my career in antiques and auctions so the significance of the fact that my work table at the house was a prototype of Mies van der Rohe's Tugendhat Table didn't really register at the time. Tugen-what? 

As Vess discovered more and more about his grandfather- Jan Ruhtenberg- it became clear that Jan was no minor modernist. He had worked close with Mies on the Barcelona collection in the late 1920s. In fact he may have even been an important collaborator on Mies' most famous piece- the Barcelona chair. Vess uncovered 2 early variations on the chair from his grandfather's collection that provides some evidence that Jan could have even originated the design. Jan also worked and lived with Phillip Johnson. Vess uncovered letters from Mies and Phillip Johnson revealing that his grandfather was thick with the most important designers of the time. But until recently history has not been kind to Jan. 

Last month Indianapolis Monthly ran a great story on Jan including a good accounting of Vess' quest to finally give his grandfather the respect he deserves. 

This Friday, September 2nd, Blackline Studios in the Murphy Building in Fountain Square (Indy) will host a exhibit of Jan's work. Here's more info on the event. I highly recommend you attend. 

Details: Reception, 6 to 11 p.m. Friday, Blackline Studio for Architecture, 1043 Virginia Ave., Studio 211, free, (317) 803-7900, www.blacklinestudio.net

Idea: Start Up Bowl

Here's an idea I've been working on for the last 6 months. I have decided to "open source" the idea in hopes that in openly sharing this idea it will increase the likelihood of it happening.

In short- I don't have the time to champion this idea but I do believe in it and want to see it happen. I will happily serve on the committee and also dedicate some SmallBox resources to making it happen.

Keep in mind that what I've outlined here is not meant to be carved in stone. It's an idea and whomever picks it up and runs with it should be free to do with it what they want. Also, I own StartUpBowl.com and would be happy to hand that over to a reputable organization or individual. I have a more complete brief as well I can send. Just hit me up at jeb@smallboxweb.com and I will send it over. 

Start Up Bowl:

The Idea

Ten start-up teams will compete over the 10 days leading up to the 2012 Super Bowl to win prizes.

The Objective

To change the brand of Indianapolis- not only a great sports & convention town, but also the perfect place to start a business. To highlight Indianapolis’ growing start-up scene. To attract regional, national, and possibly international, talent to compete in a 10-day start-up contest. To have national, local and industry press take notice of the event. To encourage the entrepreneurial spirit, foster creativity, celebrate risk taking, and have fun. To start new businesses that will attract and retain talent that will add to our local economy and community.

The Rules

Ten teams are selected from a pool of applicants. Each team must meet the following criteria: maximum 6 members, no more than $100K cash invested to date. Goal is to attract bootstrapped start up applicants. Any team can apply regardless of geography. One team will be eliminated per day. Judging could be based on a number of factors, including online/text voting, competing teams (Survivor style) and industry/investor judges. Final 2 teams present to a panel of celebrity investors, including local investors. Team wishing to redeem contest prizes must remain in Indiana for a minimum of one year.

The Prizes

Prizes are still to be determined as it will depend on funds/resources available. Overall objective is to compensate selected teams with an incremental increase over the course of the contest. The more days a team survives, the greater their prize. Prizes will most likely be a mix of cash, investment and resources. Current plan is to announce contest before announcing prizes since we do not expect them to be finalized until later. Some prizes may be contingent on recipient start-up team remaining in Indiana for a yet to be determined period of time (i.e. 1-2 years) after contest.

Where Have All The Good Conversations Gone?

Lately I've noticed that I don't get into as many deep, passionate debates online. As Social has matured it feels like meaning is taking a hit. Maybe we should blame transparency- the days of hiding behind a persona are all but past. Everybody knows who everybody is. There are few trolls left roaming the villages of the web.  I remember lamenting the trolls of yesteryear, wishing everyone could be the same online as they are in "real" life. So as we have emerged from the shadows and embraced transparency I feel we have also started to get too polite with each other. Feelings, which weren't much of a concern in the early days of the Web, now matter again. This seems to have created a Social Web where everyone is talking, fewer are listening and even less are conversing.

I started a music community website in 2007 using the Ning platform (still running at musicalfamilytree.net). This was a complimentary site to musicalfamilytree.com which is an MP3 archive of Indiana music from the last 30+ years (still going strong). When I first added the Musical Family Tree community it was incredibly vibrant. We had deep and meaningful conversations about everything, not just music. Some members identities were (and are) nicknames. Some of members have very "legit" careers and they felt more willing to talk about their rock'n'roll days more comfortably behind a mask. This had the byproduct of creating a community where there was some accountability but enough rabble rousers to keep things interesting.

Over time Facebook came to dominate Social and the conversations on Musical Family Tree started to die out. Facebook, as we all know, is about transparency whether you want it or not. Facebook is not a place for nicknames and trolls. Everyone is working under their real name and many of us have now been "friended" by actual friends (from all points in life), family (hey Mom!) and business associates. Real, honest conversations don't thrive in this community pool. Even if you are willing to stick your neck out on an idea or issue, many of your friends will hid in the shadows since they know their comments will be read by everyone they have ever known. Same with commenting on blogs since they are often tied into Facebook, Twitter etc. Many blogs still let you post anonymously but more and more these posts are moderated (ie deleted) by the blogger. Although I still have great conversations on the comment section of blog posts it seems more often people sit on their feedback, afraid to step on toes or just too busy to bother engaging.

Maybe we should embrace transparency but clearly we aren't ready for that yet.

So as I look around at my different hang out spots on the web I can only think of one place where I am having regular vibrant conversations- Turntable.fm. For the unacquainted this is a new (awesome) website where you can take turns DJing in a "room". Check it out. Some of Turntable's Social features include letting you create an alter ego, show you who is in the room and doesn't keep a record (to my knowledge) of the chat conversation. If you enter a room it doesn't even show a history of the conversation. You only see what is said after you joined the room. The conversations on Turntable are often very honest and fun. Sure, you end up figuring out who most of the people are (not everyone uses an alter ego) but there is still the sense that what is said on Turntable stays on Turntable. If you hang in the right rooms you get more than a small amount of music biz gossip. It is the only place on the Web right now that feels a lot like a late night kitchen conversation at a party- minus the booze.

So as Social matures I hope we create more of these "kitchens" like Turntable. The reality is that we don't want everything we say to be broadcast to everyone we know and their sister. I believe some conversations are meant to go into the ether, forever eluding Google's grasp. 

Sprinting (revisiting the Heroic Worker)

A while back I posted a blog about "heroic workers". These are the well intentioned folks that work 12+ hour days for days on end. Companies becoming addicted to them like a drug and dysfunction abounds. I want to return to this idea with a twist. I do believe there are times when we all need to sprint and essentially become that heroic worker for a week or two since opportunities arise and stuff needs to get done. 

Let's follow this running theme (not that I know much about running beyond being chased). In a long race, which is life/work/etc, we need to find and keep a workable pace. One that doesn't completely exhaust us physically and emotionally. But there are times we need to pick up speed and sprint. The challenge is working in such a way to lay the foundation during that sprint that allows you to quickly and smoothly return to that sustainable pace- not getting stuck in heroic worker mode. We all have the potential, and I think need, to feel heroic from time to time. Finding the balance between meeting that need and living a healthy, fulfilling life is the trick.  

Quality is fixed, Quantity is variable

"Fast, Good, Cheap- pick two"

No thanks.

This classic agency statement assumes that quality is a variable. In the past I accepted this logic- sure we can do something fast but it may not be as good!

I would excuse an outcome thinking "well we had to do it quickly".

What I was really doing was signaling, unwittingly- "hey, what we really care about is money, pay us and we will do something poorly if you want it done quickly."

That creates an inconsistent product which then creates market confusion. Even worse it creates culture issues- Who are we? What do we believe in? Where is the bar set?

I'm not saying that everyone should use the same measurement for quality. Our measure of quality may be lower or higher than other firms. There is space in almost every market for different quality products. What I'm advocating is to know your standards and stick to them which will mean passing on "cheap, fast" work when it can't meet your standard of "good".

So now when a client approaches us looking for quick turnaround we never put quality on the table. It's non-negotiable. Instead we negotiate around the quantity of the engagement which mostly comes down to two things- the scope of the project (features and content) and client engagement ("you will need to say 'yes' often and quickly to meet your deadline").

This focus on a consistent quality product has really changed the way we work. It has created better outcomes. It has improved the client experience. It has given the team something to be proud about. It has enabled us to hold each other accountable.

Do we always bat 1000? Heck, no. There is still much to be improved. But I'm ok with that. Perfection is, and should be, always out of reach. The goal is to keep reaching.